Australia Subclass 190 Skilled Nominated Visa Explained

A quick but important note before anything else: Subclass 190 sits within Australia's points-tested skilled migration system, administered federally by the Department of Home Affairs, but its nomination component is administered separately by each state and territory government, each of which sets and revises its own occupation list, nomination criteria, and quotas on its own schedule. This article explains the general structure of the visa — how nomination fits into the points test, how it differs from Subclass 189 and Subclass 491, and how the SkillSelect process generally works — without stating any specific state's current occupation list, points threshold, quota, or open/close dates as fixed fact. Always confirm current specifics directly against the Department of Home Affairs' own published guidance and the relevant state or territory government's own current nomination pages before relying on any of this for a real case.

For a consultancy advising skilled workers on Australian pathways, Subclass 190 is often the visa that comes into the conversation once a client's independent points profile is not comfortably clearing the bar for the sponsor-free Subclass 189 route, since a successful state nomination generally adds points of its own on top of the applicant's individual score. It sits deliberately in the middle of Australia's named skilled-visa trio — permanent like 189, but nomination-dependent like 491 — which is exactly why it is easy to blur with either neighbor in a first client conversation, and why getting the structural distinctions right matters before any numbers enter the discussion.

What "nominated" means for Subclass 190

Subclass 190 is a points-tested visa that generally requires nomination by a state or territory government agency before an applicant can be invited to apply. This is the defining contrast with Subclass 189, covered in our separate explainer on the Subclass 189 Skilled Independent visa, which requires no nomination or sponsorship of any kind. It is also the point of overlap with Subclass 491, covered in our separate explainer on the Subclass 491 Skilled Work Regional visa, which likewise generally depends on state or territory nomination, or eligible family sponsorship, rather than an independent application. Where 190 differs from 491 is permanence: 190 is generally a permanent visa from the point of grant, while 491 is provisional and only leads to permanent residence indirectly, through a separate Subclass 191 application later.

EOI, nomination, and invitation: how the pieces fit together

A candidate does not apply for Subclass 190 directly. They generally first submit an Expression of Interest (EOI) through SkillSelect, the same system used across 189, 190, and 491, recording their nominated occupation, skills assessment status, and points-test claims. For 190 specifically, a state or territory government agency generally reviews EOIs against its own current nomination criteria and, where a match is found, extends a nomination — a separate step from, and generally a precondition for, Home Affairs subsequently issuing an invitation to apply for the visa. Because nomination is the state's own decision, the specific process, documentation, and timing for seeking it are set by that state or territory, not by Home Affairs, and can differ meaningfully from one jurisdiction to the next.

The points test, and what state nomination generally adds to it

Subclass 190 uses the same broad points-test framework applied across Australia's points-tested skilled visas, generally weighing factors such as the applicant's age, English language ability, skilled employment experience, and educational qualifications. What is specific to 190 is that a successful state or territory nomination generally contributes 5 points toward the applicant's total score, on top of those individual factors — a structural feature of the visa that is well established, distinct from the current minimum score or what is actually proving competitive in a given round, neither of which this article states as a fixed figure, since both are settings Home Affairs reviews and revises. A candidate whose independent points profile sits below a competitive threshold for Subclass 189 may still find that a state nomination's contribution changes their position meaningfully, which is one reason 190 is often raised as an alternative once 189 looks unlikely on points alone.

Why occupation lists and criteria vary by state — and must be checked per state

This is the part of Subclass 190 that most needs verification rather than recollection. Each participating state and territory government generally sets its own occupation list, its own specific nomination criteria for each occupation on that list, and its own quota and open/closed status for its nomination streams, independently of the other states and independently of the federal government. An occupation open for nomination in one state at a given time carries no guarantee it is open in another state, or that it will still be open in the same state a few months later — these programs have generally been revised, paused, and reopened before, sometimes more than once within a single program year. Bodies such as Victoria's Skilled and Business Migration program, the NSW skilled visa program, Business and Skilled Migration Queensland, Migration SA, Migration WA, and Tasmania's skilled migration program each publish their own current criteria, and a consultancy should check the specific state a client is targeting directly against that state's own current pages rather than a remembered list or a competitor state's settings.

The state commitment, and how it differs from 491's regional condition

Nominated applicants are generally expected to live and work in the nominating state or territory for a period after grant, commonly discussed as around two years, though the exact terms and how they are framed should be confirmed against that specific state's current nomination conditions rather than assumed to be identical across jurisdictions. This is a meaningfully different kind of condition from Subclass 491's designated-regional-area requirement: 491 ties the holder to a defined regional footprint for the life of a provisional visa, whereas the Subclass 190 expectation is generally tied to a specific state rather than a regional/non-regional distinction, and it applies to a visa that is generally already permanent at grant. Subclass 189, by contrast, carries no such location expectation at all — a 189 grantee can generally live anywhere in Australia from the outset.

What a consultancy should actually verify

Given how much of Subclass 190 turns on a specific state's current settings rather than one federal rulebook, the practical discipline is verification per state rather than memorization of how the visa works in general. Before advising a client, it is worth confirming which state or territory's occupation list currently includes the client's nominated occupation, since the same occupation can be open in one state and closed in another simultaneously; confirming that state's current specific nomination criteria; confirming whether the relevant stream is currently open to new nominations at all; confirming the current points-test settings and what score is actually resulting in invitations; and confirming the current expectation around living and working in the nominating state after grant. Our Australia visa consultant software page covers how VisaBOS helps a consultancy track nominating state, occupation and skills assessment status, and EOI stage together on one connected case record — though it is a case-management tool, not a source of immigration policy, so it does not replace confirming live nomination criteria and occupation-list status with the relevant state or territory government and with Home Affairs.

To be direct about what this article will not do: it will not state a specific current points-test minimum, a specific current visa application charge, a specific current processing time, or any specific state or territory's current occupation list contents, quota, criteria, or open/close dates, because none of those specifics were confirmed as fixed, unchanging facts at the time of writing, and repeating an unverified one to a client could cause genuine harm to a real case.

Frequently asked questions